不同类型核燃料对热管冷却反应堆燃耗性能的影响
doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202234.220156
Influence of different types of nuclear fuel on burnup performance of heat pipe cooled reactor
-
摘要: 热管冷却反应堆采用固态反应堆设计理念,具有功率密度高、结构紧凑、固有安全性高等特点,在深空探索、深海勘探、偏远地区等场景中具有广阔的应用前景。核燃料作为热管冷却反应堆的重要组成部分,不同类型核燃料在堆芯燃耗分析时会呈现不同的中子学性能。基于美国爱达荷国家实验室(INL)提出的热管冷却反应堆INL Design A,利用清华大学蒙特卡罗中子输运程序RMC (Reactor Monte Carlo code)建立堆芯物理模型,选取UO2,(U0.9Pu0.1)O2,U-10Zr,U-8Pu-10Zr,UN,UC这6种核燃料开展燃耗计算,分析了不同核燃料、不同功率水平对热管冷却反应堆堆芯燃耗性能的影响。计算结果表明:在堆芯燃耗深度相同情况下(20.8 GW·d·t−1),装载U-8Pu-10Zr燃料的堆芯所需235U富集度最低(9.8%),具有较好的U-Pu增殖性能。堆芯功率处于5 MW的热管冷却反应堆,燃料中241Pu的存在不仅没起到增大堆芯燃耗深度的作用,反而导致堆芯剩余反应性和堆芯寿期末次锕系核素(MAs)的产量增大,影响反应堆的安全性与经济性。因此,对于装载含有Pu燃料的小功率长寿期热管冷却反应堆,需重点关注241Pu对堆芯燃耗性能的影响。
-
关键词:
- 热管冷却反应堆 /
- 燃耗计算 /
- RMC程序 /
- 241Pu核素
Abstract: The heat pipe cooled reactor adopts the solid-state reactor design concept, and it has the characteristics of high power density, compact structure and high inherent safety. It has been extensively used for deep space exploration, deep sea exploration, remote areas electricity markets and other scenarios. Nuclear fuel is an important part of the heat pipe cooling reactor, different types of nuclear fuel will reflect different neutronics performance on the reactor burnup analysis. In this paper, based on the heat pipe cooled reactor INL Design A proposed by the Idaho National Laboratory (INL), the burnup calculation is done by selecting six nuclear fuels : UO2, (U0.9Pu0.1)O2, U-10Zr, U-8Pu-10Zr, UN and UC. The effects of different nuclear fuel and power levels on the burnup performance of heat pipe cooled reactor core were analyzed. The calculation results show that under the same core burnup depth (20.8 GW·d·t−1), the core loaded with U-8Pu-10Zr fuel requires the lowest 235U enrichment (9.8%), and has better U-Pu breeding. For the heat pipe cooling reactor with the core power of 5 MW, the presence of 241Pu in the fuel does not increase the core burnup depth, but leads to the increase of residual reactivity of the core and the yield of the secondary actinides nuclides (MAs) in the core end of life, which affects the safety and economy of the reactor. Therefore, for the low-power and long-life heat pipe cooled reactor loaded with Pu fuel, it is necessary to focus on the influence of 241Pu on the core burnup performance.-
Key words:
- heat pipe cooled reactor /
- burnup calculation /
- RMC code /
- 241Pu nuclide
-
图 1 RMC输出INL Design A几何结构图
Figure 1. Geometries of INL Design A by RMC
图 2 不同核燃料堆芯keff随燃耗深度的变化
Figure 2. Core keff of different nuclear fuel varies with burnup depth
图 3 堆芯keff随控制鼓旋转的变化
Figure 3. Core keff change with rotation of control drum
图 4 不同功率反应堆堆芯燃耗
Figure 4. Reactor core burnup of different power
图 5 不同功率下不含241Pu反应堆堆芯燃耗
Figure 5. Reactor core burnup without 241Pu at different powers
图 6 U-Pu燃料循环燃耗链
Figure 6. Burnup chain of U-Pu cycle
表 1 有效增值系数keff计算结果
Table 1. Calculation results of effective increment coefficient keff
control condition calculated value of keff in this paper calculated value of keff of INL difference of keff /10−5 all poisons out 1.028 82±0.000 33 1.028 25 57 control drums rotation 180° 0.950 98±0.000 33 0.950 42 56 annular shutdown rod in 0.945 89±0.000 33 0.945 55 34 solid shutdown in 0.959 30±0.000 34 0.959 33 −3 all poisons in 0.845 04±0.000 33 0.845 94 −90 表 2 典型压水堆乏燃料中钚的含量
Table 2. Plutonium composition in a typical PWR spent fuel
plutonium isotope mass fraction/% 238Pu 2.332 239Pu 56.873 240Pu 26.997 241Pu 6.105 242Pu 7.693 表 3 不同功率水平反应堆燃料Pu同位素分析
Table 3. Pu isotope analysis of reactor fuel at different power levels
nuclide quantity of fissile nuclides and fissionable nuclides/kg difference/kg at 5 MW at 200 MW 238Pu 8.319 10.422 2.103 239Pu 311.710 311.134 −0.576 240Pu 137.792 138.676 0.884 241Pu 3.533 29.835 26.302 242Pu 37.129 37.447 0.318 表 4 不同功率水平反应堆乏燃料分析
Table 4. Spent fuel analysis of reactor at different power levels
spent nuclear fuel nuclide half-life/a quantity of fissile nuclides and fissionable nuclides/kg difference/kg at 5 MW at 200 MW MAs 237Np 2.14×106 2.71 0.71 2 241Am 432.2 27.46 2.15 25.31 243Am 7 380 1.80 1.72 0.08 243Cm 8 500 3.72×10−4 0 3.72×10−4 244Cm 18.1 0.08 0.14 −0.06 245Cm 28.5 5.43×10−4 4.25×10−4 1.18×10−4 LLFPs 99Tc 2.11×105 2.70 2.70 0 129I 1.27×107 0.61 0.62 −0.01 135Cs 2.30×106 3.91 4.34 −0.43 深圳SEO优化公司如何用360搜索优化网站青浦区网站搜索引擎优化培训机构怎么优化网站东城网站优化推广公司广州黄埔网站优化推广芙蓉区怎么网站优化安庆如何做网站推广优化昌吉网站seo优化哪家好铜川网站优化工作室企业网站搭建搜索引擎优化公司网站做seo优化有什么用个人护理网站优化寮步网站优化推广青岛网站快照优化网站流量优化350112永城个性化网站优化怎么收费SEO网站优化经理招聘网站的优化过程有哪些乳山网站seo优化网站溧阳市网站关键词优化报价商丘百度网站优化报价单彭水网站优化多少钱优化网站关键词怎么做锡林浩特网站优化拱墅企业网站优化推广临猗网站优化系统武安网站优化费用怎样进行网站优化网站推广优化淄博公司全椒县网站优化歼20紧急升空逼退外机英媒称团队夜以继日筹划王妃复出草木蔓发 春山在望成都发生巨响 当地回应60岁老人炒菠菜未焯水致肾病恶化男子涉嫌走私被判11年却一天牢没坐劳斯莱斯右转逼停直行车网传落水者说“没让你救”系谣言广东通报13岁男孩性侵女童不予立案贵州小伙回应在美国卖三蹦子火了淀粉肠小王子日销售额涨超10倍有个姐真把千机伞做出来了近3万元金手镯仅含足金十克呼北高速交通事故已致14人死亡杨洋拄拐现身医院国产伟哥去年销售近13亿男子给前妻转账 现任妻子起诉要回新基金只募集到26元还是员工自购男孩疑遭霸凌 家长讨说法被踢出群充个话费竟沦为间接洗钱工具新的一天从800个哈欠开始单亲妈妈陷入热恋 14岁儿子报警#春分立蛋大挑战#中国投资客涌入日本东京买房两大学生合买彩票中奖一人不认账新加坡主帅:唯一目标击败中国队月嫂回应掌掴婴儿是在赶虫子19岁小伙救下5人后溺亡 多方发声清明节放假3天调休1天张家界的山上“长”满了韩国人?开封王婆为何火了主播靠辱骂母亲走红被批捕封号代拍被何赛飞拿着魔杖追着打阿根廷将发行1万与2万面值的纸币库克现身上海为江西彩礼“减负”的“试婚人”因自嘲式简历走红的教授更新简介殡仪馆花卉高于市场价3倍还重复用网友称在豆瓣酱里吃出老鼠头315晚会后胖东来又人满为患了网友建议重庆地铁不准乘客携带菜筐特朗普谈“凯特王妃P图照”罗斯否认插足凯特王妃婚姻青海通报栏杆断裂小学生跌落住进ICU恒大被罚41.75亿到底怎么缴湖南一县政协主席疑涉刑案被控制茶百道就改标签日期致歉王树国3次鞠躬告别西交大师生张立群任西安交通大学校长杨倩无缘巴黎奥运
-
[1] 余红星, 马誉高, 张卓华, 等. 热管冷却反应堆的兴起和发展[J]. 核动力工程, 2019, 40(4):1-8 doi: 10.13832/j.jnpe.2019.04.0001Yu Hongxing, Ma Yugao, Zhang Zhuohua, et al. Initiation and development of heat pipe cooled reactor[J]. Nuclear Power Engineering, 2019, 40(4): 1-8 doi: 10.13832/j.jnpe.2019.04.0001 [2] 王傲, 申凤阳, 胡古, 等. 热管空间核反应堆电源的研究进展[J]. 核技术, 2020, 43:060002 doi: 10.11889/j.0253-3219.2020.hjs.43.060002Wang Ao, Shen Fengyang, Hu Gu, et al. A survey of heatpipe space nuclear reactor power supply[J]. Nuclear Techniques, 2020, 43: 060002 doi: 10.11889/j.0253-3219.2020.hjs.43.060002 [3] McClure P R, Poston D I, Dasari V R, et al. Design of megawatt power level heat pipe reactors[R]. Los Alamos: Los Alamos National Laboratory, 2015. [4] Sterbentz J W, Werner J E, McKellar M G, et al. Special purpose nuclear reactor (5 MW) for reliable power at remote sites assessment report[R]. Idaho Falls: Idaho National Laboratory, 2017. [5] Sterbentz J W, Werner J E, Hummel A J, et al. Preliminary assessment of two alternative core design concepts for the special purpose reactor[R]. Idaho Falls: Idaho National Laboratory, 2018. [6] 屈伸, 曹良志, 郑琪, 等. 热管堆高温数据库的制作及堆芯初步物理计算[J]. 现代应用物理, 2017, 8:041202 doi: 10.12061/j.issn.2095-6223.2017.041202Qu Shen, Cao Liangzhi, Zheng Qi, et al. Development of high-temperature nuclear database and preliminary physical computation of a heat pipe reactor[J]. Modern Applied Physics, 2017, 8: 041202 doi: 10.12061/j.issn.2095-6223.2017.041202 [7] 李冠兴, 周邦新, 肖岷, 等. 中国新一代核能核燃料总体发展战略研究[J]. 中国工程科学, 2019, 21(1):6-11Li Guanxing, Zhou Bangxin, Xiao Min, et al. Overall development strategy of China’s new-generation nuclear fuel[J]. Strategic Study of CAE, 2019, 21(1): 6-11 [8] Fütterer M A, D’Agata E, Laurie M, et al. Next generation fuel irradiation capability in the High Flux Reactor Petten[J]. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 2009, 392(2): 184-191. doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.03.030 [9] Greenquist I, Powers J J. Sensitivity and uncertainty of the IFR-1 BISON benchmark[R]. Oak Ridge: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2022. [10] IAEA. Thermophysical properties of materials for nuclear engineering: a tutorial and collection of data[M]. Vienna: IAEA, 2008: 92-110. [11] Wang Kan, Li Zeguang, She Ding, et al. RMC—A Monte Carlo code for reactor core analysis[J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2015, 82: 121-129. doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2014.08.048 [12] 刘晓波, 胡泽华. 蒙卡程序计算临界基准题测试检验ENDF/B-VIII. 0核数据库[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2022, 34:026003 doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202234.210366Liu Xiaobo, Hu Zehua. Monte Carlo calculation of critical benchmarking models for testing ENDF/B-VIII. 0 nuclear data[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2022, 34: 026003 doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202234.210366 [13] 胡赟, 徐銤. 快堆金属燃料的发展[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2008, 42(9):810-815Hu Yun, Xu Mi. Development of metallic fuel for fast reactor[J]. Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 2008, 42(9): 810-815 [14] Gao Yucui, Cao Liangzhi, Yang Yongwei, et al. Physical study of an ultra-long-life small modular fast reactor loaded with U-Pu-Zr fuel[J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2020, 142: 107390. doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2020.107390 [15] Luzzi L, Cammi A, Di Marcello V, et al. Application of the TRANSURANUS code for the fuel pin design process of the ALFRED reactor[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2014, 277: 173-187. doi: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.06.032 [16] Liu Bin, Wang Kai, Tu Jing, et al. Transmutation of minor actinides in the pressurized water reactors[J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2014, 64: 86-92. doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2013.09.042 [17] Yang W S, Kim Y, Hill R N, et al. Long-lived fission product transmutation studies[J]. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 2004, 146(3): 291-318. doi: 10.13182/NSE04-A2411
计量
- 文章访问数: 762
- HTML全文浏览量: 313
- PDF下载量: 108
- 被引次数: 0